Q & A March 9, 2003

Q & A 1 2 3


Dear Mr. Lee:

My applications for my brothers’ immigration were approved on April 20, 1990. After I received the forms from the Visa Center in winter 2000, I called my two brothers in China, asking them to send the notarized birth and marriage certificates. When the Hawaii immigration service center filled in the forms for us, they realized the spelling of the names on the forms were different from that on the notarized papers, due to the difference between Cantonese and Mandarin spellings.) The amended forms were sent to the Visa Center. We got the notice in April, saying that the forms had been sent to Guangdoing Consulate. There hadn’t been any response since then. One of my young brothers hired a lawyer to make inquiry, and we got an interview notice 20 days later. The first younger brother of mine went to the interview, along with his other 6 family members. Later he was handed 2 pieces of paper for reviewing. When my second younger brother and his other 3 family members went to the interview, he was kicked out because his name on the form was different from that on the computer, which was my third younger brother’s, and also because he had changed his name. I, therefore, asked the Hawaii immigration service center to send the notarized amendment and explanation to Guangdong Consulate, as well as to the lawyer. It’s been a month and no reply was heard.

Question:

  1. For my first younger brother’s case, will it take forever to get the response? How can he push for a reply?
  2. The name of my second younger brother was mistaken as my third one on the Consulate’s computers, was it the mistake of the Visa Center or the Consulate?
  3. Why hasn’t the Consulate responded to us even though I had faxed the amendment over?
  4. Could my two younger brothers send a letter to the Vice Center, inquiring the current situation of their cases?
  5. Is it feasible if we ask the U.S. Congressmen to help us?

Dear reader:

  1. The problem in your first younger brother's case appears to be fairly simple -- the difference between Mandarin and Cantonese spellings -- and would not appear to be the type of situation that would take a long time for the consulate to resolve. It would not appear to warrant a fraud investigation if it can be readily seen that the two names are the same. Your first younger brother can communicate with the consulate on a periodic basis to attempt to obtain a resolution on his case at the earliest possible time. I do note that security clearances because of the 9/11 events are taking their toll upon immigrant visa processing, and that individuals who have been interviewed and approved on the date of interview are having to wait anywhere from two-six months to obtain final security clearance from the U.S. before being given the immigrant visas.
  2. It is difficult to know how your second younger brother's case became mixed in with your third younger brother's case. I cannot tell you whether it was the mistake of the National Visa Center or the consulate in Guangzhou. It would appear that the consulate will have to sort out the two brothers' cases, and determine whether your second younger brother is completely documentarily qualified in addition to ensuring that the only difference in name is the Mandarin and Cantonese spellings.
  3. The consulate responds in its own time. It is not unusual that a month has passed by and you have not heard back from the consulate. You can of course continue to check with the consulate for further news.
  4. According to your letter, your two younger brothers' cases are currently with the American consulate in Guangzhou . As such, the National Visa Center has nothing further to do with their cases unless the consulate sends the cases back to the National Visa Center for further documentation or other reasons.
  5. You can certainly ask a U.S. congressman's office to assist you with your inquiries at the consulate. You may, however, wait a little longer before enlisting the congressman's assistance. A one month period of time without reply is not considered a long time in consular processing.

Dear Mr. Lee:

One of my friends in China is thinking to do investment immigration in the U.S. via me.

  1. What is the policy of investment immigration? How much capital does it need? What is the scope of investment?
  2. How much is the attorney fees? How many years does it take? What is the success rate?

Dear reader:

The policy of investment immigration is now to make potential investors hire the correct amount of people, and invest the correct amounts of money. Previously many firms and consulting companies guaranteed immigration through investment to individuals through investment vehicles in which the amount and risk by the investor was much less than required by statute. These investments relied upon prior guidelines and memorandums issued by the INS. The INS Central Office took a long look at the investment program in 1997 and was of the opinion that many of the investments were circumventing the statutory intent of putting the correct amounts of money at risk. Therefore the INS invalidated many immigration investor cases and forced others to amend their investments to the statutory amount. Many other investment cases are still being contested in the federal courts.

The statutory amount of investment in most areas of the country is $1 million. In areas of high unemployment and rural areas, the amount drops to $500,000. The investments must be in a commercial enterprise and must generally result in the hiring of 10 U.S. workers. In answer to your request for fees, I do not quote attorney's fees publicly. It is difficult to state how long it will take to immigrate through investment at this time inasmuch as more scrutiny is being given to investor cases. The Texas Service Center which handles such applications for half of the nation is not even willing to give a time line as to such adjudications. The California Service Center, which handles the other half of the nation, does not bother to list I-526 investor applications on its aging bulletin. Insofar as success is concerned, if the investment is done correctly according to the statute, the immigrant visa should be granted. Where the investment does not meet the statute's requirements because of reliance upon past conversations, guidelines or memos by the INS, the chances of success would accordingly drop.


Dear Mr. Lee:

I, an immigrant from China, have been a U.S. Citizen and paid tax for more than ten years. I will be retiring soon. Since my wife and son reside in China, I intend to spend my later years there, too.

Questions:

  1. Can I keep receiving Social Security benefits if residing permanently in China?
  2. If I have to give up my U.S. citizenship in order to live in China permanently, can I still receive Social Security benefits?
  3. Is there any way that I can keep my Social Security benefits while residing in China?

Dear reader:

We do not profess to be experts in the field of social security and so can only refer you to the government's website (www.ssa.gov) which states that a U.S. citizen can continue receiving Social Security benefits outside the United States, but that payments will stop for a non-citizen after that individual has been outside the United States for six full calendar months-with limited exceptions.

 

Copyright © 2003 Alan Lee, Esq.
The information provided here is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Law Office of Alan Lee or establish an attorney-client relationship.