Q & A March 23, 2003

Q & A 1 2


Dear Mr. Lee:

My relative immigrated to the U.S. in January 2001. At the time, his daughter and son, who came to the U.S. with him, were both under the age of 21. They have studied at schools in the U.S. since then. He has to, however, go back and forth between China and U.S.A. on a regular basis, for his mother is very ill. Due to the inconvenience, he is thinking to return his Green Card to the local U.S. consulate.

Question: Will returning the Green Card affect the legal status of his children? (The son is 19 years old, and the daughter is 20. Both have Green Cards.)

Dear reader:

The question in your relative's case of whether the green cards of his children are safe if he returns his card to the U.S. consulate depends upon the category under which he came to the U.S. and the reason, timing, frequency and length of his trips back overseas since he entered in January 2001. If he entered through a family relationship, the green card is generally not revocable for dependent family members who remain in the U.S. unless the INS can show that the principal never had an intention to permanently reside in the U.S.. If your relative entered through a labor certification or other employer petitioned case, he must have an intent to work for the sponsoring organization on a permanent basis at the time of entry, and his not working for the organization at all or only working for a short period of time could be grounds to revoke the dependent family members' green cards on the basis that the non-work reflects the principal's real intent on entry. In your relative's case, relevant factors for the INS to consider if it wishes to challenge the permanent residence status of the dependents is the length of your relative's mother's illness, its severity, prognosis, whether other members of the family could care for her instead of your relative, the location of your relative's wife (if he is married), your relative's working situation in the home country, and any ties and bonds which he established in the U.S.. Both the INS and U.S. consulate are aware that principals sometimes do not wish to immigrate because they are satisfied with their situations at home, and merely wish the green card in order to give their children better career opportunities in the United States.


Dear Mr. Lee

I have been in the U.S. for 12 years, and have held the Green Card for 12 years. Due to my old age, my memory and ears are no good. I failed the naturalization test in 1999, so I gave it up. I intend to take the test in Chinese when I shall have had the Green Card for 15 years. The problem is that I am not supposed to leave more than three months each year. During the past 12 years, I returned to China for 6 months in ’94 because of my father’s stroke. After my father passed away, I returned for another 4 months. In ‘01, I went back for 4 months for my own medical treatment.

Question:
Is it that even if I shall have been in the U.S. for 15 years, I won’t be allowed to take the naturalization test in Chinese in the future?


Dear reader:

When you complete your 15 years of permanent residence, you will be allowed to test in the Chinese language. There is a difference between the required "period of residence" of 15 years and the requirement for "physical presence". An individual is only required to be physically present in the U.S. most of the time. Individuals have been naturalized by the INS who spent slightly over one-half of the time physically present on U.S. soil during the required period of residence. Although there is a presumption that individuals who leave the U.S. for over six months lose their eligibility for naturalization, this is only a presumption and can be rebutted by a good explanation at the time of the naturalization interview. In your case, your list of absences is not such as would preclude a reasonable INS examiner from allowing you to naturalize at the end of the 15th year taking the test in Chinese.

 

Copyright © 2003 Alan Lee, Esq.
The information provided here is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Law Office of Alan Lee or establish an attorney-client relationship.