Alan Lee's Talk At Rutgers University On January 27, 2008 - PERM labor certifications (Part 4 of 6). Published in Sing Tao Weekly on 3/9/08

By Alan Lee, Esq.

(This is the fourth of six parts of the talk given by Alan Lee, Esq, before the Rutgers University Chinese Students and Scholars Association on January 27, 2008. In this part, the article picks up with "PERM", which is item 4 on the outline which was handed out to audience members before the talk and is available on our website at www.AlanLeeLaw.com. Here Mr. Lee discusses PERM labor certifications and their predecessors, the recent rule that employers must pay for labor certification applications, the common pitfalls of applications, and technical aspects of their filing. The talk has been edited to improve readability. The next installment will discuss the categories of outstanding professor or researcher and national interest waivers.)

Now we're going to change our focus to employment based cases, specifically labor certifications under PERM, outstanding researcher or teacher, and national interest. These are ones that U.S. students and scholars are probably most interested in pursuing.

Labor certifications under PERM -- In the very distant past, we had TR (or traditional labor certifications). What is traditional? That meant no prior recruitment. We used to send in just the ETA 750 forms to the State Labor Department, wait for them to process the forms, and await instructions for the job order, ad, and posting and anything else. That type of case was very labor-intensive to the Department of Labor, and so the TR cases used to take approximately four-five years. Then the Labor Department sometime in the 1990's came up with RIR (or reduction in recruitment labor certification) applications. In RIR, all the work was done prior to submission, and the Department of Labor would then give a waiver of the need for any further recruitment efforts in deserving cases. Lawyers and employers had to do the ads, the posting, other recruitment if the case warranted it, the compliance statement, and send the paperwork to the State Department of Labor with a request for waiver of further recruitment efforts. That was good for a period of time until the backlog grew over the years. This was exacerbated by a large spike of cases occasioned by the promulgation of a new law, section 245(i) of the Immigration and and Nationality Act, which allowed most illegal aliens the privilege of adjusting status in the United States without having to return to their home countries if they could prove that they had filed a labor certification application or immigrant visa petition by April 30, 2001, and were physically present in the States on December 21, 2000. When the backlog grew to over 300,000 cases, however, the Department of Labor was left wondering what else it could do. So they came out with PERM in 2005 which they had been promising since 2002. PERM is an acronym for Program Electronic Review Management System in which labor certifications are now mostly adjudicated electronically. PERM has been the only method of filing labor certification cases since March 28, 2005. It is more complex than TR or RIR. But it has the same goal, and that is to make sure that there are no able, willing, qualified or available U.S. workers for the job. PERM allows you to file two ways -- the first by mailing in and the second by on-line filing. There are two processing centers, one in Chicago and the other in Atlanta. Everything on the eastern seaboard is sent to Atlanta, by the way. What are the differences between on-line filing and mail-in filing? Mail-in filing is usually used by people who have not set up an account with the Department of Labor. The Labor Department strongly favors on-line filing. That is because mail-in filings require much more manpower. The Department of Labor is not supposed to penalize those who use mail-in filing, but sometimes it appears that if you send an application to them by mail, and because it makes them work harder, they lose your stuff, they retype your papers with typos and blame you for them, or just delay your case. So you obviously want to do on-line filing if you possibly can. Actually, I meant your employer should be doing on-line filing, not you. The Labor Department in its January 9, 2008, report stated that PERM on-line filings in a clear case are taking between 45-60 days. Looking at the past, it is tremendously encouraging to say that we can get a labor certification within that time frame. TR and RIR used to take about four or five years. Of course, an audit on your case will take more time. And if they deny your case and you ask for appeal or reconsideration, you can think in terms of at least one year.

Who pays for a labor certification? The Labor Department came up with the new rule effective July 16th of this past year that only the employer can pay the labor certification part of a permanent residence case. That's enforceable by penalties and they are such that no one wants the applicant to pay that part anymore. Of course, that puts more pressure on employers because previously the thinking was that H-1Bs might be to our (employers') benefit, but the green card is only for the workers' benefit. Why should we (employers) have to pay for it? The Labor Department does not charge a filing fee at this time for labor certification applications although it is thinking of doing so in the future. Even so, attorneys fees and ads cost quite a bit of money, but now the Department of Labor is saying that the applicant cannot pay for any of this. Once the labor certification is received, however, the worker can pay for the next parts of the case which are usually the I-140 and I-485. But in terms of the labor certification itself, only the employer can pay. This may unfortunately have a drag effect upon employers thinking about sponsoring their workers for the green card.

Labor certification applications are usually broken up into those dealing with professionals and non-professionals. When we do advance recruitment for PERM cases, we're doing three or maybe four steps for non-professionals. We're doing the job order, job posting, ads, and posting the job in any in-house media that the organization might have. Professionals are a different story. With them, the Labor Department makes the employers go through another three steps of recruitment. What are the choices for the three steps? Employers can satisfy the three steps from a list of ten. 1 Internet postings -- they could do Monster.com, Job.com, The New York Times.com; 2 they can do their own Internet site; 3 Bonus programs or other things like that in the company; 4 Executive search or headhunters firms; 5 Job fairs, 6 Radio or TV ads, 7 Advertising in local or ethnic newspaper appropriate to the job opportunity, 8 Trade or professional organizations; 9 On campus recruitment; and 10 A notice of job availability at the campus placement office. They just have to pick three out of the ten. But as you can see, filing for a professional under PERM is more complicated than for a nonprofessional.

What are the mechanics of filing? All recruitment must be done first, and all of it must be completed within 180 days of the date of filing the labor certification application. Also, except for one step out of the 3 additional steps for professionals, 30 days must have passed from the completion of the other steps before filing. For example, you cannot have two steps, Internet postings and campus recruitment, be done only three weeks prior to filing. But if you only have one, say the ethnic newspaper ad, done two weeks before the filing, that would be OK.

What are the common pitfalls of labor certification applications? There are actually many. Typos - the problem that we see here with the PERM process is that it is tremendously sensitive. It reminds me of that kid game, "Operation", I think it's called, where there's a patient on the table and the kids are supposed to touch a certain part, and if they get right, they're rewarded and if not, there's a big "Buzz" and loss of points or something. Well, that's the thing with labor certifications these days. With the ETA 9089 form, it's become a sort of "Operation" game. If you put down the wrong thing, "Buzz", your case is denied. The form itself is very sensitive. The Department of Labor is trying to revamp the form, and earlier promised to have the new form out by March 2008. The current form itself expires in March. However, the timeline for replacing the form has been extended until the summer. In the meantime, we're stuck with this form. In several instances of which we've heard, one question on the form asked if the employer was offering the position to the alien, and when the employer answered "No", that application was denied. In a second instance, the employer put down the wrong date for the second ad on the form and the case was denied even though the ad had actually run on the correct date and the employer explained this to the Department of Labor. The computer just looked at the form, determined that the date of the second ad was not a Sunday which is mandatory and denied the case outright without more. And then there was the instance of the lawyer whose address was not on the form although it was on all of the other papers including the lawyer's G-28 authorization of representation and that case was denied. Hopefully, the Department of Labor will get better at this, but in the meantime it's too highly sensitive. What of the other pitfalls? Qualifications being too high is one -- for example, the employer requires a Ph.D. for the job whereas the Department of Labor thinks it is only worth a bachelor's degree. Or else a language requirement that cannot be justified -- why did the employer put it in? Because the alien spoke the language of course. Or else combination job duties -- trying to discourage U.S. workers from applying for the job by making it so that the person has to do three jobs. Or ads being too general -- the Department of Labor does not think that you have to put too much specificity in the ads themselves, however, they do not want the ads to be so general that no one knows what the jobs are about. The employer's name must also be in the ad and the location of the business. Leaving out the employer's name makes it a deniable case. Same with not putting down the location of the work. Or non job-related reasons for rejecting an applicant -- for example, an employer having eight people apply for the job and rejecting them all because he likes the alien better. That's not a job related reason.

What's the effect of the economy? It's seems that if you have good times in the United States, people are not looking so hard at the labor certifications. They're willing to let things slide sometimes. But if we're really looking at a recession in which the economy tanks, you can expect special scrutiny on labor certification applications in the future.

When can you file for a labor certification? Actually you can do it at any time that your employer agrees to do it. Does it matter whether you file while you're on OPT? Probably only if you're going to travel overseas to pick up a visa - but other than that, if you file it during a period of OPT, that's fine. If you file it during the time that you're on an H-1B, that's fine. If you're on an H-1B, you want to file it at least before your fifth year ends. Otherwise if your labor certification and I-140 preference petition are not approved by the end of your sixth year, you're not going to get another extension on your H-1B by Immigration. When you're thinking about filing for a labor certification, you're talking about dealing with the company. Some companies have a policy not to sponsor anybody for the green card. Other companies will make you wait six months. That's easy. Other companies have a policy of at least one year. That might be becoming the norm. So I guess that part is between you and the company. Then again, coming back to that H-1B situation, an employer might not want to start up your labor certification case unless you have the H-1B approved. Because, what happens if you don't get your H-1B, and the employer has already started the recruitment phases of a green card? What could happen at that point? It may turn out that you will not have the authority to work for the company until your priority date becomes available, which could be years. That would be a problem.

 


The author is a 26+ year practitioner of immigration law based in New York City. He was awarded the Sidney A. Levine prize for best legal writing at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law in 1977 and has written extensively on immigration over the past years for the ethnic newspapers, World Journal, Sing Tao, Pakistan Calling, Muhasha and OCS. He has testified as an expert on immigration in civil court proceedings and was recognized by the Taiwan government in 1985 for his work protecting human rights. His article, "The Bush Temporary Worker Proposal and Comparative Pending Legislation: an Analysis" was Interpreter Releases' cover display article at the American Immigration Lawyers Association annual conference in 2004, and his victory in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a case of first impression nationwide, Firstland International v. INS, successfully challenged INS' policy of over 40 years of revoking approved immigrant visa petitions under a nebulous standard of proof. Its value as precedent, however, was short-lived as it was specifically targeted by the Administration in the Intelligence Reform Act of 2004.

This article © 2008 Alan Lee, Esq.

 

Copyright © 2003-2012 Alan Lee, Esq.
The information provided here is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Law Office of Alan Lee or establish an attorney-client relationship.