Speed of Naturalizations - Can't They Do More?
By Alan Lee, Esq.†‡
In reading over the testimony of Director Emilio T. Gonzalez of
U.S.C.I.S. before Congress on January 17, 2008, I am struck with
the question, "Can't they do more?" Mr. Gonzalez went
through all the statistics and they seemed imposing as to why naturalization
applications have increased from a current average of 7 months or
less to approximately 18 months. He cited receiving in excess of
3 million applications and petitions for immigration benefits in
the summer of 2007 as compared with 1.8 million applications and
petitions received in the same period the previous year; that in
June and July 2007, naturalization applications increased nearly
350% compared to the same period in 2006. To deal with this, Mr.
Gonzalez stated that U.S.C.I.S. has begun hiring 1500 new employees
of which 723 are adjudicators; U.S.C.I.S.'s request to rehire experienced
annuitants has been approved; the agency has identified 704 former
U.S.C.I.S. employees who have retired; and U.S.C.I.S. will ask current
staff to continue working additional overtime and shift work and
detail employees to areas most heavily impacted by the surge.
These steps are all sound, but U.S.C.I.S. and the Administration
should work as hard as they can to implement these practices immediately
and at the utmost speed to curb the growing suspicion that the Administration
is attempting to disenfranchise Hispanics caught in the naturalization
slowdown from voting in the Presidential election of 2008, where
they are widely expected to deliver a heavily Democratic vote. Hispanics
comprised the vast majority of the approximate 1.2 million naturalization
applicants in 2007. Through the Republicans' largely anti-immigrant
rhetoric and actions, they have lost traction among Hispanics who
voted 40% Republican in 2004. The Hispanic vote is extremely important
as the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials
expects at least 9.3 million Hispanics to vote this year, 1.7 million
more than in 2004. This is a huge bloc of voters that may shift
the balance of power in a number of states. Persons of Hispanic
origin, legal or illegal, by and large support immigration reform
and blame the Republicans for not compromising on the immigration
issue since 2005 including blocking comprehensive immigration reform
legislation in 2007 and mandating the punitive work raids that followed
which tore away detained parents from young children. In 2006, the
Hispanic Republican vote dropped by 10%, and in a poll late last
year by the Pew Hispanic Center, only 23% identified themselves
as Republicans while the number identifying themselves as Democrats
grew to 57%.
Why should the Republicans care? Because their being identified
with further actions against the Hispanic population will have negative
repercussions not only for this election, but for future ones. For
the Republicans to keep a sizable number of Hispanics in the fold,
they should assuage any rising anger associated with perceived disenfranchisement
and take more positive action to assure that the maximum number
of naturalization applicants in 2007 become citizens in time to
vote in November.
Suggested actions are the following although others more cognizant
of the agency process may think of more effective ones:
-
For the short term, transfer naturalization officers on detail
from district offices with light naturalization loads to those
with larger numbers of applicants.
-
For the short term, transfer most I-130 relative petition
adjudicators from the service centers to district offices with
larger numbers of naturalization applicants. Most experienced
adjudicators are able to easily handle naturalization applications.
Remaining I-130 adjudicators should only concentrate on adjudicating
I-130 petitions from immediate relatives of U.S. citizens (parents,
spouses and children) or preference category cases where the
priority dates are close to becoming current.
-
For the short term, transfer most employment based adjudicators
from the service centers to district offices with larger numbers
of naturalization applicants. Remaining adjudicators should
only concentrate on adjudicating I-140 and I-485 applications
where the priority dates are current or are close to becoming
current. This move should be possible because of reduced workload
in the wake of the 300,000 plus I-485 adjustment of status to
permanent resident applications filed in July and August which
effectively backlogged most of the employment based categories
for years, leaving adjudicators unable to adjudicate most of
the I-485 applications anyway.
-
For the short term, transfer most adjudicators of employment
authorization applications and advance parole applications from
the service centers in Texas and Nebraska to the district offices
with larger numbers of naturalization applicants. This should
be possible as these service centers have by and large finished
processing these applications for applicants who filed in the
summer I-485 surge. Renewals of applications from this surge
group will not be due for close to a year, and there is no expectation
of a large number of new applications in the future as these
are ancillary applications to I-485s, and cannot be filed without
matching I-485 applications. An employment based I-485 is only
capable of being filed when the current visa availability date
surpasses the case's priority date, which is set at the time
that a labor certification application is filed or, if labor
certification is not required, at the time of the immigrant
visa petition (I-140) filing with U.S.C.I.S. The summer I-485
surge has effectively backlogged the visa availability of most
employment based categories meaning that not only can pending
cases not be adjudicated but that much fewer cases can be filed
for adjustment in the upcoming years.
-
For the short term, transfer most clerical staff who have
been involved with catching up on receipts caused by the summer
surge to do the administrative work on naturalization applications
(if needed). From our information, U.S.C.I.S. anticipates catching
up on remaining receipts in January 2008.
-
Work with the FBI to have more staff assigned to clearing
FBI name checks, especially focused on naturalization applications.
With the enhanced fees that U.S.C.I.S. has been receiving from
applicants since July 30, 2007, the agency should be well able
to finance more staff to look into paper records to ascertain
whether they pertain to the applicants.
There are many ways that an Administration and its agencies can
frustrate a process internally while cultivating an image of earnest
cooperation. This can be seen in many overseas elections in which
the politicians scream loudly that they have been aboveboard, but
their supporters take legal, quasi legal, or extralegal steps to
stifle opposition. Weighing in the balance of true fairness for
Republicans should not only be considerations of this election but
that Hispanics are the the largest and most rapidly growing minority
group in this country and that their children born in the U.S. will
be eligible to vote in future elections. The perception that they
have been unjustly deprived of the right to vote in this coming
election may redound unfavorably on any Republican efforts to cultivate
them in the future.
In the case of the U.S.C.I.S., the agency has lost credibility
since its Visagate fiasco in July 2007 and must do more to convince
the public that it is not making a subtle attempt to hold down the
Hispanic vote to aid the Administration. In Visagate, the Department
of State had opened up visa availability for employment based categories
1-3 entirely for the month which threatened a large slice of U.S.C.I.S.'s
revenues to be raised through a fee hike scheduled on July 30, 2007.
Because of the Department of State action, applicants could submit
I-485s for the entire month of July at the then current rate of
$395 instead of the scheduled increase of $1,010. In response, U.S.C.I.S.
reportedly processed 25,000 applications in 48 hours in its service
centers in Texas and Nebraska including all security clearances
in an attempt to close visa availability on July 2, 2007. For June
and the first two days of July 2007, the agency reportedly completed
over 60,000 employment based cases whereas it had only finished
66,425 such cases from October 2006-May 2007, a rate of 8,303 per
month. Visagate was finally only settled after huge public outcry
with the agency giving an additional period of time from July 17,
2007-August 17, 2007, for applicants to file I-485 applications
in the affected categories at the old rate.
A look at the numbers of cases claimed to be completed in June
and the first two days of July 2007 shows that the agency processed
almost 700% more cases than the average per month prior to that
time and raises legitimate questions concerning the long timetable
for naturalization as given by Mr. Gonzalez. He stated the surge
in naturalization applications in June and July 2007 being nearly
350% over that same period for 2006, but that is still only half
of the approximate 700% spike of completions for the employment
based cases for one month and two days over a typical month. It
appears that the agency can work much more quickly than its average
if it is of such mind. So it would behoove the U.S.C.I.S. and Republican
Administration to promote trust in the workings of the agency by
transparently working as hard as possible to naturalize those who
filed in 2007 in time to vote in 2008.
____________________
Sources for this article include The New York Times January 19,
2008, "The Immigrant Vote"; The Wall Street Journal articles
on January 18, 2008 "Paper Jam May Curb Latino Vote" and
October 2, 2007, "Immigration Losers"; and the author's
own articles in the Immigration Daily, July 10, 2007 "Is
Money Behind U.S.C.I.S. Move To Have Department of State Take Unprecedented
Action To 'Update' July Visa Chart?", and July 14, 2007
"Details
Leaking Out on July Visa Chart Fiasco Show Extraordinary and Legally
Questionable Steps by U.S.C.I.S. to Exhaust Visa Numbers to Protect
Fee Hike Collections."
|