World Journal Weekly Q & A - March 9, 2008
Q & A 1. 2.
3.
Q&A 1.
Naturalization Applicant with Much Time Outside the U.S. Before
the Five-year Eligibility Date May Still be Eligible to Naturalize
Joe reader asks:
I received my green card on 1/25/1995. Until 8/2000, I only came
to U.S. 3 times for short stays. Therefore, there was 1928 days
I was not in the U.S.. However, I applied 2 reentry permits. From
8/22/00 on, I stay here long-term and work in CA. During this period,
I left U.S. only 4 times, totaling 254 days.
Recently, I want to apply for naturalization but did not know how
to answer the Part 7 questions on N-400 form concerning all the
trips outside of U.S.. My questions are:
1. If I must write down all the trips since I received my green
card, I worried the records prior to the recent 7 years were not
good and the examiner might deny my case. One attorney said it was
the discretion of the examiner but I had lived 3 years out of the
recent 5 years, I should be fine.
2. One attorney told me, if I provided with recent 5 years trips,
it should be fine. But it does not meet the requirement and if the
examiner requests for additional document or denies my case, it
could be trouble.
3. I changed a new passport in 7/2000. Could I just fill in the
trips on this passport and pretend I lost my old passport and did
not remember them?
What should I do to ensure the initial application process would
be passed?
Dear reader,
1 If you did not violate the law previously by staying outside
the United States for a year or more with just a green card or for
two years or more with a reentry permit during a single trip, it
is my belief that an examiner will only look at your recent five
years to determine your eligibility for naturalization.
2 You are correct in stating that putting down only trips in the
last five years does not meet the requirement of the form (N-400)
as it asks for all trips since obtaining your permanent residence
card. It would be in your best interest to put down all trips.
3 I strongly recommend against your suggested course of action.
4 Although no one can guarantee a successful result, your best
course of action appears to be honesty.
Q&A 2.
Naturalization Applicants Must Still Maintain Continuous Residence
in the U.S. Between the Interview and Swearing in Date
Zhang reader asks:
I applied my naturalization in 6/05 and passed the interview test
in 11/05. Later, I received CIS notice that my case is pending security
check. It has been over 2 years. I heard some of the background
checks took many more years. My questions are:
1. When I receive my swear in notice, do I still have to meet the
residency requirement (no less than 30 months in the recent 5 years?)
2. I am 73 years old and want to go back to China a long period
of time to visit relatives. If I apply for reentry permit, will
it affect my swear in obligation?
Dear reader:
1 Naturalization applicants must still maintain continuous residence
in the United States. If you will be taking trips which will be
of more length than your stay in the United States, you might very
well encounter a problem when you are scheduled for swearing-in.
That notice asks for you to put down the trips that you have made
from the United States since the interview.
2 Going back to China for a long time to visit relatives would
most likely endanger your naturalization. The act of applying for
a reentry permit alone has no effect upon naturalization - it is
the act of leaving for a long time which does.
Q&A 3.
Counting Rules of the CSPA and the Unpredictability of Visa Bulletin
Movement
Jin reader asks:
I am a U.S. citizen. On 10/18/2000, I applied my sister and her
family to immigrate. At the time her son was only 11 (born on 9/24/89).
I understand the family immigrant visa of F4 now is up to 7/8/97.
So, my sister’s family still has to wait 3 years, by the time,
the son will be 22, over the age of 21. Is he qualified for CSPA?
Dear reader:
It is difficult to state at this time whether your nephew will
be qualified under the CSPA to immigrate with his family. The movement
of dates on the monthly visa bulletin of the Department of State
cannot even be called an inexact science. It is very difficult to
accurately predict where the date is going to be in the next year
much less the next two or three years. Laws can also change during
that time which could affect the movement of the dates or entitlement
to benefits. Under present rules of the CSPA in your case, the child's
age is frozen as of the date that your sister's priority date is
surpassed by the date on the visa bulletin. From that date, the
child is given credit for the period of time that the I-130 petition
stayed with Immigration before it was approved. In addition, 45
days can be added in your situation under the U.S. Patriot Act.
If the credits of time put your nephew under the age of 21, he would
be entitled to immigrate with his family under today's counting
rules.
|