Mr. Lee's Response to Further Comments on His Article, "PROBLEMS WITH PRESIDENT BUSH'S GUEST WORKER PROPOSAL" Unexcerpted Full Text before ILW Editing

By Alan Lee, Esq.

Dear Editor:

As a final response to comments on my article, "Problems with President Bush's Guest Worker Proposal", kindly allow me to reply to the views of Mr. Alexander as contained in the Immigration Daily of 3/7/06. He initially believes that the article refers to studies done prior to "our recent influx of poorly educated, unskilled and illegal aliens". From my understanding and views of most immigration officials who have been crowing about their successes at stopping illegal immigrants from entering in the past few years, there has been less illegal immigration now than in the past. There promises to be even less in the future with the erection of a massive fence across the entire Southwest U.S. The studies remain valid as when conducted in the early 2000's. Mr. Alexander asked whether Mr. Greenspan's comment considered the impact of illegal aliens on state finances. The answer is in the affirmative as Mr. Greenspan stated that immigrants, including undocumented workers, in essence donate $27 billion to state and local economies. Mr. Alexander fails to see how millions of poorly educated and unskilled workers would be able to replace retiring more skilled and educated U.S. workers. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor, more than 33 million new job openings are being created in this country between 2000 and 2010 in occupations requiring little or moderate training. The jobs will be in restaurants, construction, retail, trucking, hospital care and other fields. The coming labor shortage is not only of knowledge persons, but also of manual laborers. Mr. Alexander also fails to take into consideration that the undocumented are usually among the more ambitious and enterprising people of the countries that they leave, having the initiative to strike out for a new life rather than remaining in their routines back home. Mr. Greenspan further said that short of a major increase in immigration, economic growth cannot be safely counted upon to eliminate deficits and the difficult choices that will be required to restore fiscal discipline. Among others, the Employment Policy Foundation, a conservative think tank, predicted a shortage of 35 million workers by 2030; and the Conference Board, a New York based economic research group, predicted a 31 million worker shortfall. In addition, the children of those who first come to the United States are widely acknowledged to give a net benefit to the country. I am aware of the 2004 unfavorable study of the benefits of immigration by the anti-immigration group, FAIR, through its former arm, the now independent Center for Immigration Studies, but the study's methodology is flawed and the motivation suspect. Mr. Alexander states that low-wage workers who contribute to Social Security receive an amount disproportionately larger than their contribution to Social Security than do high wage workers. Mr. Alexander must remember that Social Security benefits are not reachable for most until the age of 62 and the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 expressly prohibits SSI benefits to permanent residents. Without a massive number of new workers at the bottom of the Social Security pyramid supporting the large class of retiring baby boomers, the Social Security system will go bankrupt in the future unless benefits are sharply curtailed or the monies to fund Social Security are found elsewhere in the federal budget. It may well be that by the time most now undocumented workers are eligible for Social Security, they will find that they are getting 10¢ in benefits for every dollar contributed. Finally it is not for the purpose of giving cheap, subsidized labor for Agribusiness and Wal-Mart that this country needs many more workers - it is for the betterment of this country and the future that we leave to our children and their children.

Alan Lee, Esq. New York, NY

To see original comments, click here and scroll down to "Letters" section.


The author is a 26 year practitioner of immigration law based in New York City. He was awarded the Sidney A. Levine prize for best legal writing at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law in 1977 and has written extensively on immigration over the past years for the ethnic newspapers, World Journal, Sing Tao, Pakistan Calling, Muhasha and OCS. He has testified as an expert on immigration in civil court proceedings and was recognized by the Taiwan government in 1985 for his work protecting human rights. His article, "The Bush Temporary Worker Proposal and Comparative Pending Legislation: an Analysis" was Interpreter Releases' cover display article at the American Immigration Lawyers Association annual conference in 2004, and his victory in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a case of first impression nationwide, Firstland International v. INS, successfully challenged INS' policy of over 40 years of revoking approved immigrant visa petitions under a nebulous standard of proof. Its value as precedent, however, was short-lived as it was specifically targeted by the Administration in the Intelligence Reform Act of 2004.

This article © 2006 Alan Lee, Esq.

 

Copyright © 2003-2012 Alan Lee, Esq.
The information provided here is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Law Office of Alan Lee or establish an attorney-client relationship.