News Update - July 18, 2009
By Alan Lee, Esq.†‡
Surging Backlogs Increase Stress on Immigration Judges
The New York Times reports that immigration judges are found under
strain. According to a study by Georgetown University evaluating the
level of stress undergone by 96 immigration judges, the judges are
strained on a similar level as prison wardens and hospital physicians,
groups that consistently report exceptionally high stress levels.
On the questionnaires, immigration judges complained of the constant
pressure dealt by the court administrators to reach faster decisions
while cases pile up at a speedy rate and the complexity of cases requires
deep analytical thought. One anonymous judge cites in his grievance
“the persistent lack of sufficient time to be really prepared
for cases.” Another simply states, “There isn’t
enough time to think.” A majority of the cases heard by these
judges involve a foreigner seeking asylum claiming that he or she
would face life-threatening persecution if (s)he returned home. One
judge comments, “This job is supposed to be about doing justice,
but the conditions under which we work make it more and more challenging
to ensure that justice is done.”
In a related story, in the Dallas Morning News, the backlog of
cases in Dallas’ immigration court has reached its highest
point in a decade. The Transactional Records
Access Clearinghouse group at Syracuse University which analyzes
federal efficiency
reports that at the end of April, Dallas had 2633 pending cases.
While the number of immigration cases handled by judges in Dallas
has climbed 50% since fiscal year 1999, the backlog can be primarily
attributed to the shortage of administrative judges, larger caseloads
and complexity of immigration disputes. Three years ago, the Justice
Department recommended hiring 40 new judges, but only a few judges
have been hired. The Dallas court was short at least one full-time
judge for years, and only recently hired its fourth judge. Furthermore,
a new study by the Brookings Institution finds the nation’s
immigration courts overburdened because of a nationwide judge shortage.
The average immigration court judge hears approximately 1200 removal
proceedings per year, compared to an average annual caseload of
480 for district judges. As a result of the Dallas shortage and
backlog, it takes eight months on average for a case to be resolved
in Dallas. This has impacted thousands of immigrants since authorities
have started to hold many more of them in detention for longer periods
of time as they challenge deportation orders or seek asylum. Taxpayers
have been suffering as well since they contribute financially to
each detainment.
|